Public records • People power • Nonpartisan voter participation
SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY ACCOUNTABILITY

Money has access.
People have power.

Residents should be able to see who funds local campaigns, compare public commitments with voting records, and organize around veterans, housing, education, and community priorities.

Policy accountability—not candidate endorsements

The same standard applies to every public official.

My City Is My Home does not endorse or oppose candidates. We advocate for policies and publish documented, issue-based records showing who supported a policy, who opposed it, what changed, and what evidence was offered.

How we will evaluate public officials and candidates

Support and opposition will be highlighted equally using the same factual criteria, regardless of district, political relationships, or whether an official agrees with us on other issues.

Public commitmentsWhat the office or candidate said in writing, meetings, public forums, or recorded statements.
Policy actionHow the official voted, amended, delayed, advanced, or opposed the issue.
Public recordsCampaign-finance filings, agendas, minutes, videos, reports, and source documents.
Community responseWhether the official answered questions, consulted affected residents, and explained any change in position.
Why this work is expanding

Public testimony matters. Organized voters create lasting accountability.

Veterans and advocates spent years researching the VASH housing issue, meeting with officials, building support, and speaking at City Hall. Exemptions were still added late in the process, and several offices that had previously communicated support voted to preserve them.

The lesson from the veteran housing vote

Showing up for one meeting is not enough. Residents need to document commitments, follow the money, monitor votes, organize by district, and remain engaged through elections and policy reviews.

The community response

We are building a durable, nonpartisan network of veterans, renters, homeowners, parents, students, and neighborhood residents who can act together on the issues affecting daily life.

Mayor and council campaign-finance review

All 12 reviewed campaigns—including the mayor

The approved expanded review identified contributions associated with apartment, REALTOR®, real-estate, development, property-management, construction, finance, and related interests. The mayor is shown first, followed by every council district and the additional reviewed campaign.

$470,492.77
Sum of all 12 campaign totals shown below

Transparency, not accusation

Campaign contributions are legal. Contributions alone do not prove bribery, corruption, or that a vote was purchased. The public-interest question is how organized money may shape access, relationships, campaign capacity, and the policy environment in which decisions are made.

Mayor — citywide office

Gina Ortiz Jones

$54,322.90
District 1

Sukh Kaur

$67,755.00
District 2

Jalen McKee-Rodriguez

$26,845.31
District 3

Phyllis Viagran

$30,050.00
District 4

Edward Mungia

$23,924.72
District 5

Teri Castillo

$22,142.15
District 6

Ric Galvan

$13,417.53
District 7

Marina Alderete Gavito

$65,525.68
District 8

Ivalis Meza Gonzalez

$33,522.76
District 9

Misty Spears

$25,075.54
District 10

Marc Whyte

$72,365.00
Additional reviewed campaign

Melissa Cabello Havrda

$35,546.18
Public data sources and methodology

Where these numbers came from

The totals were calculated from publicly available campaign-finance records filed with the City of San Antonio and the Texas Ethics Commission.

City of San Antonio filings

Campaign-finance reports filed by mayoral and City Council campaigns were reviewed to identify direct contributions associated with apartment, REALTOR®, real-estate, development, property-management, construction, finance, and related interests.

Texas Ethics Commission records

State campaign-finance records were reviewed to identify political committees, affiliated donors, and additional contribution relationships relevant to the expanded review.

Cross-checking and duplicate control

Names and contribution records were cross-checked across the public filings. Known duplicates were excluded before the final campaign totals were calculated.

Expanded-review calculation:
verified direct industry-linked contributions + additional verified related contributions not already counted = each campaign’s expanded-review total.
Methodology notice: The $470,492.77 citywide figure is the arithmetic sum of the 12 campaign totals displayed above. These figures are public-transparency metrics based on City of San Antonio and Texas Ethics Commission filings. They are not findings of bribery, corruption, illegality, or a purchased vote. Ambiguous donor identities are not publicly attributed without verification.
The VASH ordinance as a case study

What the ordinance does now—and what must change next

San Antonio passed Ordinance 2026-05-07-0295 on May 7, 2026. The City’s owner-and-manager FAQ identifies May 8, 2026 as the effective date. The ordinance creates source-of-income protections for qualified veterans using Housing Choice or VASH vouchers, but exemptions and enforcement limitations remain.

Current protection

A covered housing provider may not refuse to rent to an otherwise qualified veteran when the sole reason is that the veteran uses a federal housing-assistance voucher.

  • Veterans must still satisfy lawful, reasonable, and consistently applied screening requirements.
  • The City FAQ states that owners or operators with five or more rental units are covered.
  • Properties receiving City incentives since May 2021 may have broader voucher-acceptance requirements at that property, regardless of veteran status.
  • Complaints may be reported through 311, the City Fair Housing Program, or the City’s online discrimination-complaint page.

Current enforcement

The ordinance uses escalating civil enforcement after the City investigates and finds a violation.

  • First violation: written warning.
  • Second violation: mandatory compliance training within 30 days.
  • Third violation: $500 administrative fee.
  • Further violations: additional $500 fees and referral to the City Attorney’s Office for any further enforcement available by law.

Open the City complaint page →

Public clarification is needed: the City FAQ says the ordinance applies to owners or operators with five or more rental units, while Section 2 of the signed ordinance says a housing provider that rents “more than 5 (five) units.” The City should correct or formally clarify this inconsistency so veterans, housing providers, investigators, and the public receive one clear rule.
November 2026 policy priorities

Remove every exemption

Apply the protection consistently across rental houses, duplexes, small properties, and larger communities.

Clarify the unit threshold

Resolve the conflict between “five or more” in City guidance and “more than five” in the signed ordinance.

Publish enforcement data

Report complaints, investigations, outcomes, repeat violations, response times, and outreach results.

Create ownership transparency

A rental registry can help identify property ownership, portfolio size, responsible parties, and patterns across the rental market.

Learn about rental registries →

Strengthen veteran outreach

Veterans, case managers, leasing staff, property owners, and community organizations need clear information about rights and responsibilities.

Evaluate whether enforcement works

Determine whether complaint-based enforcement and the current penalty structure actually change access and housing choice.

The documented accountability questions

All council offices had previously communicated support when the proposal contained no exemptions. The public deserves clear answers about the final change.

  • What changed between earlier support and the final vote?
  • Who requested the exemption language?
  • What evidence showed the exemptions were necessary?
  • Why were veteran advocates not brought back to the table?
  • Did industry access or influence play any role in preserving the exemptions?

Supported removing every exemption

Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones
D2 Jalen McKee-Rodriguez
D4 Edward Mungia
D6 Ric Galvan

Voted to keep the exemptions

D1 Sukh Kaur
D3 Phyllis Viagran
D5 Teri Castillo
D7 Marina Alderete Gavito
D8 Ivalis Meza Gonzalez
D9 Misty Spears
D10 Marc Whyte
The district organizing ladder

Build from 10 voters to a citywide civic force.

The goal is not a list of passive names. It is an opt-in network of informed residents who can receive policy updates, contact officials, attend meetings, help with nonpartisan voter participation, and hold public officials accountable.

10

Committed residents in every district

Establish one reliable district team, regular communication, and basic participation in hearings and council outreach.

100 people citywide
100

Organized residents in every district

Support voter-registration education, candidate questionnaires, community briefings, and rapid response before major votes.

1,000 people citywide
1,000

Informed voters in every district

Create a durable constituency that can elevate veterans, housing, education, and neighborhood priorities across San Antonio.

10,000 people citywide
Veterans and renters organizing together

A broader coalition can change what City Hall must prioritize.

Veterans provide a clear test of whether public promises become policy. Renters bring scale to housing advocacy. Homeowners, parents, students, and neighborhood residents connect housing to schools, transportation, healthcare, safety, and economic opportunity.

Shared community issues

Veteran services, rental access, property stability, education, neighborhood investment, transportation, public safety, and fair access to local government.

Shared civic strategy

Research the record, explain the issues, register and educate voters, compare candidate responses, participate in elections, and continue accountability after Election Day.

Nonpartisan civic participation

Register. Learn. Organize. Vote.

The community does not need to match large political committees dollar for dollar. It needs informed residents who participate consistently and vote based on the issues affecting their families and neighborhoods.

Register and verifyConfirm voter registration, address, district, and election deadlines.
Study the public recordReview commitments, contributions, votes, and candidate responses.
Participate before decisionsContact offices, attend meetings, submit testimony, and organize neighbors.
Vote and remain engagedUse the ballot, then continue monitoring decisions after the election.

250 years of independence. Freedom should include meaningful housing choice.

Do not simply thank veterans for defending freedom. Defend their freedom to choose where they live.

Sign the Petition
Research and public record

Use the records, guidance, and policy tools already available.

City Fair Housing Complaint Page

Official City information for housing-discrimination complaints and Fair Housing contact information.

Open the City complaint page →

Public-Record Video Series

Hear directly from the Mayor, councilmembers, staff, and veteran advocates.

Watch the video series →

Contact the Mayor and City Council

Use the official City directory to find current district offices and contact information.

Open the City directory →

Rental Registry Policy Tool

PolicyLink explains how rental registries can improve ownership transparency, outreach, data collection, and enforcement.

Review the policy tool →

Housing-Provider Overview

An external property-management overview of the ordinance, exemptions, screening rules, and six-month review. Included for public understanding; MCIMH does not adopt every conclusion.

Read the external overview →

Veteran Housing Petition

Support removing every exemption from San Antonio’s veteran housing voucher protections.

Sign the petition →

Join the District Network

Join residents organizing around veterans, housing, education, and community priorities.

Join the campaign →

Official Ordinance and City Guidance

Read San Antonio Ordinance 2026-05-07-0295, the City’s property-owner and manager FAQ, enforcement procedures, and the official City Council vote record.

Read the Ordinance and City Guidance →

Campaign-Finance Transparency Review

Review the $470,492.77 identified across 12 campaigns, the campaign-by-campaign totals, donor categories, methodology, public data sources, and accountability standards.

Read the Public Campaign-Finance Report →
Important: Campaign contributions are legal and do not, by themselves, prove wrongdoing or a purchased vote. My City Is My Home is a 501(c)(3). We do not endorse or oppose candidates. We advocate for policies and apply the same documented, issue-based accountability standard to supporters and opponents. Veterans must still meet lawful and reasonable rental-screening requirements, and some smaller rental properties remain outside the current ordinance.